For the last 30 years, EMS instructors/trainers/educators have followed national standard curricula, and now we're moving to national education guidelines.
My observation has been that these national MINIMUMS have turned in to the local MAXIMUMS - that local programs rarely go beyond what is recommended or required in those documents. And...heaven forbid...those documents are usually not completely on target.
How many folks go through EMT and/or paramedic school and never learn much about long term care? Or alcohol/substance abuse/detox? Or mental health problems and crises? Or how to save yourself if attacked by a patient, a family, or bystanders - or better yet, how to avoid such a situation? Or how to drive a 16-20,000 lb vehicle, which is required on every call?
We talk a lot about recruitment and retention in EMS. One of the major reasons cited that people leave their jobs that their "expectations" of the job don't match the reality. Do we contribute to that by teaching a curriculum that is heavily oriented toward didactic medical knowledge, and emergency interventional procedures, that are not very often used, and by overlooking the palliative, compassionate care needs of the elderly, the impoverished, etc? Do we set our young up for failure by preparing them for lights, sirens, resuscitation and then sending them out to do safety-net medical social work and transportation for which they have not been prepared?
I observe, from my perspective as a service chief, a disconnect between what is taught and what I think needs to be taught. I'd be interested in hearing how our educator community feels about these questions?
Thanks....Skip
Tags:
-
▶ Reply to This