My medical director has chosen to write guidelines as opposed to protocols. The intent is that it gives us the ability to think outside of the box and veer from the standard if it is necessary. The difference has been explained that we need not go from step 1 to step 2 and so forth but rather picking and choosing from what is available to treat a patient that does not fall directly into these predefined categories. Is everyone else still following the recipe?

Views: 385

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Our protocols have been implemented the way you describe for years.  It seems to work good, but you can't be a "protocol compliance" robot in that environment.

That's a good thing!

I agree. You need the ability to think outside the box and I think many other programs have moved this direction.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Follow JEMS

Share This Page Now
Add Friends

JEMS Connect is the social and professional network for emergency medical services, EMS, paramedics, EMT, rescue squad, BLS, ALS and more.

© 2016   Created by JEMS Web Chief.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service